Yoga and Christianity: Are They Compatible?
by Michael Gleghorn
What is Yoga?
What is yoga? For many in the West, yoga is simply a system of physical exercise, a means of strengthening the body, improving flexibility, and even healing or preventing a variety of bodily ailments. But if we inquire into the history and philosophy of yoga we discover that “much more than a system of physical exercise for health, Yoga is . . . [an] ancient path to spiritual growth.” It is a path enshrined in much of the sacred literature of India. :”(Raphael, Essence and Purpose of Yoga: The Initiatory Pathways to the Transcendent,Massachusetts: Element Books, Inc., 1996, back cover.)”:, Thus, if we truly want a better understanding of yoga, we must dig beneath the surface and examine the historical roots of the subject.
Before we begin digging, however, we must first understand what the term “yoga” actually means. “According to tradition, ‘yoga’ means ‘union,’ the union…of the finite ‘jiva’ (transitory self) with the infinite’…Brahman’ (eternal Self).” :”(Brad Scott, ‘Exercise or Religious Practice? Yoga: What the Teacher Never Taught You in That Hatha Yoga Class’ in The Watchman Expositor,Vol. 18, No. 2, 2001: 5. )”: “Brahman” is a term often used for the Hindu concept of “God,” or Ultimate Reality. It is an impersonal, divine substance that “pervades, envelops, and underlies everything.” :”(Ibid. )”: With this in mind, let’s briefly look at three key texts that will help us chart the origin and development of yoga within India.
It appears that one can trace both the practice and goal of yoga all the way back to the Upanishads, probably written between 1000-500 B.C. :”(Ibid. )”:
One Upanishad tells us: “Unite the light within you with the light of Brahman.” :”(Ibid., cited in Swami Prabhavananda and Frederick Manchester, The Upanishads: Breath of the Eternal, New York: New American Library, 1957, 120ff.)”: Clearly, then, the goal of yoga (i.e. union with Brahman) is at least as old as the Upanishads.
In addition, the word “yoga” often appears in the Bhagavad Gita, a classic Hindu text possibly written as early as the fifth century B.C. :”(Bhagavad Gita, trans. Juan Mascaro, New York: Penguin Books, 1962, back cover.)”: In chapter 6, Krishna declares: “Thus joy supreme comes to the Yogi . . . who is one with Brahman, with God.” :”( Ibid., 71.)”:
Finally, in about A.D. 150, the yogi Patanjali systematized yoga into eight distinct “limbs” in his Yoga Sutras. These eight limbs are like a staircase, supposedly leading the yogi from ignorance to enlightenment. In order, the eight limbs are: yama (self-control), niyama (religious observances), asana (postures), pranayama (breathing exercises), pratyahara (sense control), dharana (concentration), dhyana (deep contemplation), and samadhi (enlightenment). :”(John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House Publishers, 1996, 601.)”: ‚ It’s interesting to note that postures and breathing exercises, often considered to be the whole of yoga in the West, are steps three and four along Patanjali’s “royal” road to union with Brahman.
We see that yoga is an ancient spiritual discipline deeply rooted in the religion of Hinduism. This being so, we may honestly wonder whether it’s really wise for a Christian to be involved in yoga practice. Next, we’ll continue our discussion by examining some of the important doctrinal differences between yoga and Christianity.
Yoga and Christianity: What are the Differences?
Many people today (including some Christians) are taking up yoga practice. We’ll later consider whether yoga philosophy can truly be separated from yoga practice, but we must first establish that there are crucial doctrinal differences between yoga and Christianity. Let’s briefly look at just a few of these.
First, yoga and Christianity have very different concepts of God. As previously stated, the goal of yoga is to experience union with “God.” But what do yogis mean when they speak of “God,” or Brahman? Exactly what are we being encouraged to “unite” with? Most yogis conceive of “God” as an impersonal, spiritual substance, coextensive with all of reality. This doctrine is called pantheism, the view that everything is “God.” It differs markedly from the theism of biblical Christianity. In the Bible, God reveals Himself as the personal Creator of the universe. God is the Creator; the universe, His creation. The Bible maintains a careful distinction between the two. :”(See Romans 1:18-25.)”:
A second difference between yoga and Christianity concerns their views of man. Since yoga philosophy teaches that everything is “God,” it necessarily follows that man, too, is “God.” Christianity, however, makes a clear distinction between God and man. God is the Creator; man is one of His creatures. Of course man is certainly unique, for unlike the animals he was created in the image of God. :”(See Genesis 1:26.)”: Nevertheless, Christianity clearly differs from yoga in its unqualified insistence that God and man are distinct.
Finally, let’s briefly consider how yoga and Christianity differently conceive man’s fundamental problem, as well as its solution. Yoga conceives man’s problem primarily in terms of ignorance; man simply doesn’t realize that he is “God.” The solution is enlightenment, an experience of union with “God.” This solution (which is the goal of yoga) can only be reached through much personal striving and effort. Christianity, however, sees man’s primary problem as sin, a failure to conform to both the character and standards of a morally perfect God. Man is thus alienated from God and in need of reconciliation. The solution is Jesus Christ, “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” :”(John 1:29.)”: ‚ Through Jesus’ death on the cross, God reconciled the world to Himself. :”(See 2 Corinthians 5:19.)”: ‚ He now calls men to freely receive all the benefits of His salvation through faith in Christ alone. Unlike yoga, Christianity views salvation as a free gift. It can only be received; it can never be earned.
Clearly, Christianity and yoga are mutually exclusive viewpoints. But is every kind of yoga the same? Isn’t there at least one that’s exclusively concerned with physical health and exercise? Next, we’ll take a closer look at hatha yoga, the one most often believed to be purely physical in nature.
What Is Hatha Yoga?
Here we’ve learned that yoga is an ancient spiritual discipline rooted in a belief system that is utterly incompatible with Christianity. But is this true of all yoga? Isn’t hatha yoga simply concerned with physical development and good health?
Hatha yoga is primarily concerned with two things: asana (physical postures) and pranayama (breathing exercises). But it’s important to realize that both asana and pranayama also play a significant role in Patanjali’s raja (or “royal”) yoga. In the traditional eight “limbs” of Patanjali’s system, asana and pranayama are limbs three and four. What then is the relationship of hatha to raja yoga?
Former yoga practitioner Dave Fetcho states that yoga postures “evolved as an integral part of Raja . . . Yoga.” :”(Dave Fetcho, ‘Yoga,’, Berkeley, CA: Spiritual Counterfeits Project, 1978, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 602.)”: ‚ He points out that the author of the famous handbook, the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, “presents Hatha . . . solely and exclusively for the attainment of Raja Yoga.” :”(Ibid., 603.)”: He also cites a French yoga scholar who claims, “the sole purpose of . . . Hatha Yoga is to suppress physical obstacles ‚ :”(Ibid.)”: ‚ Fetcho concurs, noting that the physical postures are “specifically designed to manipulate consciousness…into Raja Yoga’s consummate experience of samadhi: undifferentiated union with the primal essence of consciousness.” :”(Ibid,02)”: These statements should make it quite clear that hatha, or physical, yoga has historically been viewed simply as a means of aiding the yogi in attaining enlightenment, the final limb of raja yoga.
This is further confirmed by looking at Iyengar yoga, possibly the most popular form of hatha yoga in the U.S. The Web site for the Iyengar Yoga Institute of San Francisco states: “BKS Iyengar studies and teaches yoga as unfolded in the Yoga Sutras of Patanjaili [sic] and the Hatha Yoga Pradipika among other classical texts. Thus Asana, or postures, are taught as one of the eight limbs . . . of yoga defined by Patanjali.” :”(See ‘Source and Context: Patanjali and Ashtanga Yoga’ at http://www.iyisf.org/. This quotation was obtained from the site on March 1, 2002.)”: ‚ In fact, the ultimate goal of Iyengar hatha yoga is precisely the same as that of Patanjali’s raja yoga. :”(Ibid.)”: ‚ Both aim to experience union with “God,” Brahman, or universal consciousness.
If all these things are so, it seems increasingly apparent that hatha yoga may ultimately involve its practitioners in much more than physical exercise. Although it may not be obvious at first, the ultimate goal of hatha is the same as every other form of yoga: union of the self with an impersonal, universal consciousness. We must remember that the Bible never exhorts Christians to seek such an experience. If anything, it warns us of the potential dangers in doing so. Next, we’ll consider whether yoga practice might, in fact, be dangerous–and why.
Can Yoga be Harmful?
Despite its touted health benefits, there are numerous warnings in authoritative yoga literature which caution that yoga can be physically, mentally, and spiritually harmful if not practiced correctly.
For instance, Swami Prabhavananda warns of the potentially dangerous physical effects that might result from yoga breathing exercises: “Unless properly done, there is a good chance of injuring the brain. And those who practice such breathing without proper supervision can suffer a disease which no known science or doctor can cure. :”(Swami Prabhavananda, Yoga and Mysticism, Hollywood, CA: Vedanta Press, 1972, 18, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 604.)”:
In addition, many yogis warn that yoga practice can endanger one’s sanity. In describing the awakening of “kundalini” (coiled serpent power) Gopi Krishna records his own experience as follows: “It was variable for many years, painful, obsessive…I have passed through almost all the stages of…mediumistic, psychotic, and other types of mind; for some time I was hovering between sanity and insanity.” :”(Gopi Krishna, The Awakening of Kundalini, New York: E.P. Dutton, 1975, 124, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 608.)”:
Finally, however, from a Christian perspective it seems that yoga could also be spiritually harmful. To understand why, let’s return to the experience of “kundalini.” Yoga scholar Hans Rieker declares, “Kundalini [is] the mainstay of all yoga practices.” :”(Hans Ulrich Rieker, The Yoga of Light: Hatha Yoga Pradipika,New York: Seabury Press, 1971, 101, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 606.)”: But what exactly is kundalini and why is it so central to yoga practice?
Swami Vivekananda summarizes the kundalini experience as follows: “When awakened through the practice of spiritual disciplines, it rises through the spinal column, passes through the various centres, and at last reaches the brain, whereupon the yogi experiences samadhi, or total absorption in the Godhead.” :”(Swami Vivekananda, Raja Yoga,New York: Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center, 1970. 16, cited in Scott, ‘Exercise or Religious Practice? Yoga: What the Teacher Never Taught You in That Hatha Yoga Class,’ 5.)”: And researcher John White takes the importance of this experience even further declaring: “Although the word kundalini comes from the yogic tradition, nearly all the world’s major religions, spiritual paths, and genuine occult traditions see something akin to the kundalini experience as having significance in “divinizing” a person. The word itself may not appear…but the concept is there…as a key to attaining godlike stature.” :”(John White, ed., Kundalini Evolution and Enlightenment,Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1979, 17, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 606.)”:
Reading such descriptions of the kundalini, or coiled serpent power, the Christian can almost hear the hiss of that “serpent of old…who deceives the whole world.” :”(See Revelation 12:9.)”: In Eden, he flattered our first parents by telling them: “You will be like God.” :”(See Genesis 3:5. )”: ‚ And though Christianity and yoga have very different conceptions of God, isn’t this essentially what yoga promises?
Swami Ajaya once said, “The main teaching of Yoga is that man’s true nature is divine.” :”(Swami Rama, Lectures on Yoga: Practical Lessons on Yoga, Glenview, IL: Himalayan International Institute of Yoga, Science and Philosophy, 1976, rev., vi, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 596.)”: ‚ Obviously this is not the Christian view of man. But if the goal of yoga is to realize one’s essential divinity through union with “God,” then shouldn’t the Christian view the practice that leads to this realization as potentially spiritually harmful? Next, we’ll conclude our discussion by asking whether it’s really possible to separate yoga philosophy from yoga practice.
Can Philosophy and Practice be Separated?
We’ve seen that yoga is an ancient spiritual discipline whose central doctrines are utterly incompatible with those of Christianity. Even hatha yoga, often considered to be exclusively concerned with physical development, is best understood as merely a means of helping the yogi reach the goal of samadhi, or union with “God.” Furthermore, we’ve seen that all yoga, including hatha, has the potential to be physically, mentally, and spiritually harmful.
In light of such evidence, it may appear that this question–“Can yoga philosophy be separated from yoga practice?”–has already been answered in the negative. And this is certainly the view of many yoga scholars. Dave Fetcho, formerly of the Ananda Marga Yoga Society, has written, “Physical yoga, according to its classical definitions, is inheritably and functionally incapable of being separated from Eastern religious metaphysics.” :”(Dave Fetcho, ‘Yoga,’ 2, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 600.)”: What’s more, yoga authorities Feuerstein and Miller, in discussing yoga postures (asana) and breathing exercises (pranayama), indicate that such practices are more than just another form of physical exercise; indeed, they “are psychosomatic exercises.” :”(George Feuerstein and Jeanine Miller, Yoga and Beyond: Essays in Indian Philosophy, New York: Schocken, 1972, 27-28, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 600.)”: Does this mean that separating theory from practice is simply impossible with yoga?
If one carefully looks through an introductory text on hatha yoga, :”(For example, Richard Hittleman, Introduction to Yoga,New York: Bantam Books, 1969)”: ‚ one will see many different postures illustrated. A number of these may be similar, if not identical, to exercises and stretches one is already doing. Indeed, if one is engaged in a regular stretching program, this is quite probable. This raises an important question: Suppose that such beginning level yoga postures are done in a context completely free of yogic philosophy. In such a case as this, doesn’t honesty compel us to acknowledge at least the possibility of separating theory from practice?
While I hate to disagree with scholars who know far more about the subject than I do, this distinction does seem valid to me. However, let me quickly add that I see this distinction as legitimate only at the very beginning of such practices, and only with regard to the postures. The breathing exercises, for various reasons, remain problematic. :”(For instance, the breathing exercises can by physically dangerous. Sri Chinmoy wrote, ‘To practice pranayama without real guidance is very dangerous. I know of three persons who have died from it…’ See Great Masters and the Cosmic Gods,Jamaica, NY: Agni Press, 1977, 8, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 604. In addition, however, from a Christian perspective such exercises may also be mentally and spiritually dangerous, at least potentially, because they can induce altered states of consciousness that may make one more vulnerable to demonic deception. Indeed, psychologist Ernest L. Rossi has written of pranayama: ‘The manual manipulation of the nasal cycle during meditation, dhyana, is the most thoroughly documented of techniques for altering consciousness.’ See Benjamin B. Wolman and Montague Ullman, eds., Handbook of States of Consciousness,New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986, 113, cited in Ankerberg and Weldon, Encyclopedia of New Age Beliefs, 595.)”: But this distinction raises yet another question, for how many people begin an exercise program intending never to move beyond the most basic level? And since by the very nature of yoga practice, such a distinction could only be valid at the very earliest of stages, why would a Christian ever want to begin this process? It seems to me that if someone wants an exercise program with physical benefits similar to yoga, but without all the negative spiritual baggage, they should consider low-impact or water aerobics, water ballet, or simple stretching. :”(Of course such programs will need to be tailored to each individual’s needs and goals. It’s always a good idea to talk to your doctor before beginning any new exercise program.)”: ‚ These programs can be just as beneficial for the body, without potentially endangering the soul. In my opinion, then, Christians would be better off to never begin yoga practice.
